China witnessed $17.5 billion worth of portfolio outflows last month, an all-time high, according to most recent data from the Institute of International Finance (IIF). The US-based trade association called this capital flight by overseas investors “unprecedented,” especially as there were no similar outflows from other emerging markets during this period. The outflows included $11.2 billion in bonds, while the rest were equities.
Data from the Chinese government also showed a record bond-market retreat by foreign investors in recent months. Overseas investors offloaded a net 35 billion yuan ($5.5 billion) of Chinese government bonds in February, the largest monthly reduction on record, according to China Central Depository and Clearing. The sell-off accelerated in March, hitting a new high of 52 billion yuan ($8.1 billion).
“China’s support for the Russian invasion of Ukraine was clearly the catalyst for capital to leave China,” said George Magnus, an associate at the China Center at Oxford University and former chief economist for UBS.
“There is nervousness about China’s ambiguous, but Russia-leaning stance on the Ukraine conflict, which raises worries that China could be targeted by sanctions if it helps Russia,” said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, who you have studied China’s economy and US-China relations.
But geopolitical tension is not the only reason behind the exodus. The rate hike in the United States and China’s strict Covid-related lockdowns have also played a role in scaring investors.
“The rise in interest rates, especially in the US, makes the nominal return associated with Chinese fixed income assets less attractive on a relative basis,” Chorzempa said.
“The economy is enfeebled and being made worse by government actions and by zero Covid policies,” said Magnus.
Confusion about the future
With these mounting worries, some fund managers and analysts have started questioning whether they should invest in China at all.
“China is seeing deep foreign capital outflows as doubts increase regarding its basic investability,” said Brock Silvers, managing director for Kaiyuan Capital, a private equity investment firm based in Shanghai.
The pandemic is not the only reason behind China’s slowdown. A lot of the country’s current economic pain can be traced back to the sweeping regulatory crackdown on the private sector, which was unleashed by President Xi Jinping in 2020. There are fears that the government will continue to clampdown on sectors ranging from education to technology this year.
“Global investors don’t want to play regulatory guessing games or worry that tomorrow’s news may deplete another otherwise attractive company or business model,” Silvers said.
The speed and ferocity with which authorities have acted against private enterprise have started even the closest China watchers.
The Nasdaq Golden Dragon index, a popular index that tracks more than 90 US-listed Chinese companies, lost 31% in the third quarter of 2021, the worst quarter on record. It then shed another 14% in the final quarter of last year. By comparison, the S&P 500 rose 0.2% and 11% respectively in the third and fourth quarters of last year. The Nasdaq Composite also surged 8% in the final quarter of 2021.
Some of the money flowing out of China may have gone into US dollar assets, while there is also “a notable switch from China to India,” according to Qi Wang, chief investment officer for MegaTrust Investment in Hong Kong.
The crackdown on the private sector has also impacted private equity funds that focus on China.
Funds that raise US dollars to invest in China only attracted $1.4 billion in the first quarter of 2022, down 70% from the previous quarter, according to Preqin, a London-based investment data firm.
A separate survey by Bain & Company showed that Greater China-focused private equity funds attracted $28 billion in new funding for the second half of last year, down 54% from the first half, as global investors are increasingly concerned about political and economic uncertainty in the Chinese market.
“Looking ahead, about 55% of respondents expect the [fundraising] situation to be more challenging in next 12 months,” said Kai Zhong, a manager on the China Private Equity team at Bain & Company.
on the fence
However, while bond and equity funds may be slashing their exposure to China, there’s evidence that global companies are continuing to invest in Chinese businesses.
Foreign direct investment inflows to China hit a record high of $173 billion in 2021, up 20% from the previous year, according to data from China’s Ministry of Commerce.
Chorzempa noted that the FDI record came even though “the regulatory uncertainty and a darkening view among policymakers outside of China was already highly salient.”
“So it is not clear whether the data from the last two months represents a paradigm shift or more of a temporary recalibration to a still very strong investment relationship, especially with Europe,” he said.
According to an annual survey conducted by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China last year, only 9% of nearly 600 European companies operating in China planned on shifting any current or planned investment out of China, the lowest share on record.
Still, there are signs that some of them have become anxious about China’s zero Covid policy.
Earlier this week, China’s commerce minister Wang Wentao met with a few foreign chambers to discuss the impact of the country’s zero Covid policy.
Jens Hildebrandt, executive director of the German Chamber of Commerce in North China, told CNN Business that the participants raised some pressing issues member companies are facing related to the Covid-containment strategy, especially in Shanghai.
An ongoing lockdown in Shanghai — a major business and manufacturing hub — has forced most businesses to shut down for weeks, threatening to disrupt key supply chains for cars and electronics. It has also made port delays worse and forced the suspension of many passenger flights, sending air freight rates soaring and putting even more pressure on global supply chains.
“The current policy with lockdowns leading to productions stops, logistic and supply chain disruptions and restrictions on the movement of people do not only pose a short-term concern, but will leave their marks on the long run,” Hildebrandt said in an emailed response to CNN Business.
“As foreign companies are suffering economically, we are looking for clear signals on how the Chinese government will help to ease the burden through relief programs,” he added.